Methods and correction history
Read source methods · See scope corrections · Submit a correction
What PeptideFactSheets is
We publish plain-English compound fact sheets, comparisons, guides and learning paths for everyday readers. We explain approved medicine, active research, early evidence and the gaps behind promoted claims.
Practical references show amounts and schedules from specific approved product labels and primary human studies, together with the product, indication or participant context and source limits. An experimental study regimen is not presented as established routine use.
PeptideFactSheets is independent and is not affiliated with the FDA, NIH, ClinicalTrials.gov, drug manufacturers, clinics, pharmacies, peptide vendors, or research-chemical sellers.
Medical and commercial limits
- A clinic, telehealth service, pharmacy, supplement store, or peptide vendor
- A diagnosis, prescribing, or personalized advice tool
- Personalized prescribing or self-use protocols, including cycling and stacking
- Injection or reconstitution how-to, or sourcing instructions
- A substitute for a licensed healthcare professional
Who creates the content
PeptideFactSheets is responsible for selecting sources, publishing summaries and handling corrections. Articles are published under the PeptideFactSheets name. We do not claim independent clinical review.
We use software-assisted research and drafting, with source checks recorded separately from clinical review. If a statement seems wrong or unclear, send us the page and a supporting source. We assess corrections privately and do not publish treatment anecdotes as evidence.
Our editorial approach
We lead with the answer, label regulatory status clearly, separate human evidence from animal and laboratory work, describe known risks, and make “what we still do not know” mandatory.
We state uncertainty when the evidence is limited.
Commitment to plain English
Technical terms are sometimes necessary. When we use one, we explain it. We avoid keyword stuffing, miracle language, fearmongering, and claims such as “studies show” without a source.
Research and source standards
We prefer current FDA labels and communications, ClinicalTrials.gov records, peer-reviewed journals, systematic reviews, and government or major medical institutions. Company announcements may document a company-reported milestone but are never treated as independent proof.
How the site is funded
PeptideFactSheets may earn revenue from clearly identified direct advertising, sponsorships, and affiliate links. Advertising does not determine coverage, evidence ratings, conclusions, or source selection. We do not maintain vendor or pharmacy relationships.